#Technical architect plus

The need for technical architecture implies an organization already has a complex enterprise architecture and some degree of formalization for managing it. This 2020 Forrester Report on EAMS is a great place to start your research. If so, you should consider formalizing your enterprise architecture approach and investing in an enterprise architecture management suite (EAMS) now. You may already be at and the point of experiencing bottlenecks. Without a formalized approach to enterprise architecture, the whole enterprise architecture could collapse if the person in charge of the EA were to leave without contingency plans in place. Additionally, this sort of enterprise architecture is vulnerable in its dependency on individuals. We consider these efforts “low-maturity” enterprise architecture.īut doing enterprise architecture this way can cause bottlenecks as an organization’s enterprise architecture scales. With regard to enterprise architecture, many organizations already are doing enterprise architecture before they have a formally recognized enterprise architecture initiative or enterprise architecture tool. The answer to both is “sooner, rather than later.” When do I need enterprise architecture? When do I need technical architecture? With this considered, we should abandon the binary question, in favor of asking “when” instead of “which.” In a world where organizations are increasingly data-driven, any ambition to scale will inevitably scale with the complexities of the systems involved too. But it’s one that needs to be given, because we’re asking the wrong question. It’s a straightforward and somewhat vague answer. Technical Architecture – Which One Do I Need? While enterprise architects have a high strategy focus, they are less detail orientated., Technical architects operate in the reverse, with solution architects somewhere in the middle. Using an orchestra as an analogy, enterprise architects would assume the role of a conductor who is less concerned with how any individual instrument operates but requires they work together cohesively to complete the performance. They have a high focus on technology, and a low focus on how that technology fits in with the enterprise’s overall strategy. Instead of seeing the organization from a high-level, strategic point of view, technical architects operate amongst the weeds. Technical architecture can be seen as the antithesis to this. Their broad scope and holistic view of the enterprise does not allow for this. In the latter, we described enterprise architects as having a “holistic view” of the organization, mostly focusing on things from a high-level, strategic point of view.Īlthough technology is something that enterprise architects are concerned with, they aren’t expected to have a deep, ground-level understanding of the tech itself.

#Technical architect plus

We previously have discussed the difference between data architecture and EA plus the difference between solutions architecture and EA.

The Difference Between Technical Architecture and Enterprise Architecture It’s a role that requires good communication and relationship management skills, as well as the ability to anticipate problems, manage their time, and operate under pressure. Typically, their operations revolve around technical services and in the context of the project lifecycle – enabling technology. They often work under more specific titles, reflecting the technology they specialize in – e.g., “Java architect” or “Python architect.” A technical architect works closely with development teams in a supervisory capacity – providing leadership and guidance during the project lifecycle.